"Why Conservative Christians Would Have Hated Jesus"
Greetings, Gentle Readers...
I've posted below an interesting article on how Jesus would be perceived in our day and age. I must admit, I find it to be more than true. Jesus was outside the status quo. He fought against the legalism of the Pharisees. He tried to show the people a new and better way to experience God.
Today we see the same. The evangelical/fundamentalist Christians fail the humility test. We see the religious right, especially as it is used in politics, damning the poor and hungry, calling poverty as if it was laziness, and slashing social programs that would help give those in difficult circumstances a hand up. Jesus taught the very opposite! Jesus taught that we should care for those who are poor, hungry, without shelter, elderly, widowed, etc. He was very specific about it. He expected it from the "church." He expected it from those who governed. He expected it from each and every one of us.
Yet, now, we hear only about hand outs, calling out those in difficult circumstances. And this should not be. The church has gone from serving the people to only serving itself.
Please take a moment to read the article below. Open your heart to what Jesus calls true service.
cgb
MONDAY, NOV 3, 2014 03:55 PM CST
Why conservative Christians would have hated Jesus
Even as they profess to spread his word, fundamentalists are forgetting Jesus' most important message
This article originally appeared on AlterNet.
Jesus never could have been the pastor of a contemporary evangelical church nor a conservative Roman Catholic bishop. Evangelicals and conservative Roman Catholics thrive on drawing distinctions between their “truth” and other people’s failings. Jesus by contrast, set off an empathy time bomb that obliterates difference.
Jesus’ empathy bomb explodes every time a former evangelical puts love ahead of what the “Bible says.” It goes off every time Pope Francis puts inclusion ahead of dogma. It goes off every time a gay couple are welcomed into a church. Jesus’ time bomb explodes whenever atheists follow Jesus better than most Christians.
Put it this way: Godless non-church-going Denmark mandates four weeks of maternity leave before childbirth and fourteen weeks afterward for mothers. Parents of newborn children are assisted with well-baby nurse-practitioner visits in their homes.
In the “pro-life” and allegedly “family friendly” American Bible belt, conservative political leaders slash programs designed to help women and children while creating a justifying mythology about handouts versus empowerment.
In “God-fearing America” the poor are now the “takers,” no longer the “least of these,” and many conservative evangelicals side with today’s Pharisees, attacking the poor in the name of following the Bible.
So who is following Jesus?
Confronted by the Bible cult called evangelicalism we have a choice: follow Jesus or follow a book cult. If Jesus is God as evangelicals and Roman Catholics claim he is, then the choice is clear. We have to read the book–including the New Testament–as he did, and Jesus didn’t like the “Bible” of his day.
Confronted by bishops protecting dogma and tradition against Pope Francis’ embrace of empathy for the “other” we have a choice: follow Jesus or protect the institution.
Every time Jesus mentioned the equivalent of a church tradition, the Torah, he qualified it with something like this: “The scriptures say thus and so, but I say…” Jesus undermined the scriptures and religious tradition in favor of empathy. Every time Jesus undermined the scriptures (Jewish “church tradition”) it was to err on the side of co-suffering love. Every time a former evangelical becomes an atheist in favor of empathy she draws closer to Jesus. Every time Pope Francis sides with those the Church casts out he is closer to Jesus. Every time conservative Roman Catholics try to stop the Pope from bringing change to the Church they are on the side to those who killed Jesus.
No comments:
Post a Comment